about this siteBiographyabout this site

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Great debate

The West Wing goes live

btn_debate_santosbtn_debate_vinick

ER, Will & Grace, The Bill, Coronation Street, that Quatermass experiment: all TV shows that have gone live as a gimmick. There's no need for it. It merely generates publicity and probably gives the cast and crew concerned a rare buzz, like working in rep again. Trust The West Wing to pull off the same stunt but for intellectual and contextual reasons: a live presidential debate between the fictional candidates, Vinick (Alda) and Santos (Smits). Now, I've read on various blogs and forums that it was unscripted. Don't be silly. Of course it was scripted. It was written by Laurence O'Donnell Jr and directed by Alex Graves. There's no way NBC are going to turn an hour of almost-primetime (well, Sunday night) to two actors doing improv, even actors of this stature. This was planned and blocked and rehearsed like a short play, and yet managed to retain a sense of live-ness that made it exciting even when watching it un-live, some weeks later, in the wrong country. It was a great episode. Gimmicky by defintion, but also sly, in that the candidates touched on issues that were not touched on by the real candidates, Bush and Kerry, in the last televised debate. As we have come to expect, this is political porn - an idealised version of real life.

I wish there was a transcript somewhere - I've searched all the political blogs and can't find one. (If you do, let me know.) The chairman was real-life journalist Forrest Sawyer, who did a calm and authoratitive job, telling off the live studio audience for clapping (which, of course, will have been scripted, just like the guy who shouted out, "You liar!" at Vinick and was removed, Walter Wolfgang-style, by the truth police). When Vinick called for the usual rules to be torn up, so that they could have a "real debate", it actually felt - I don't know - dangerous. Also convincing was when they moved out of range of their fixed podium mics, and were handed roving mics. This was clearly designed to allow the actors to roam.

"How many jobs will you create?" Sawyer asked Vinick.
"None," he replied. "Entrepreneurs create jobs. Business creates jobs. The president's job is to get out of the way."

"Republicans have tried to turn 'liberal' into a bad word," said Santos. "Well, liberals ended slavery in this country."
"A Republican president ended slavery," Vinick retorted.
"Yes, a liberal Republican, Senator. What happened to them?"

It was chilling to hear this fake-Republican say he'd rather drill for oil in Alaska and upset a few animals than, hypothetically, drill in the Grand Canyon and upset some tourists. (Alda, a committed liberal, must have relished doing this material.) Equally, you could hear a pin drop among the Democrat households of America when Santos vowed never to go to war over oil, and urged Vinick to join him in this solemn promise. He refused. George W Bush was probably watching Extreme Makeover on the other side. (Which, incidentally, whupped The West Wing in the ratings that Sunday night. It managed to squeeze its total up to about 9 million from the usual 8, but this is small beer in the world of network television, especially for a show that once commanded audiences of 18 million.)

A genuine poll after the debate went out revealed that Vinick's fake-approval ratings had gone up. Alda did do a marvellous job. But then, he is an actor and isn't going to be president. Those italics are to remind me, not you.

5 Comments:

At Sun Apr 23, 10:49:00 AM , Blogger Lee said...

You can read a transcript of the entire episode here.

 
At Sun Apr 23, 12:28:00 PM , Blogger Andrew Collins said...

Lee, you are a saviour!

 
At Sun Apr 23, 08:57:00 PM , Anonymous Peter in Dublin said...

The West Wing eh ?

I suspect that one reason this series has been successful is that viewers wish that these characters were a representation of our leaders. We wish that they weren't as influenced (directed?) by business interests, lobby groups, personal ambition and all those other blue meanies.

I think the reality would be a rather bitter espresso.

Let's face it... the fact that someone wants to run for political office should be a valid reason to rule them out. I want leaders who would rather be doing other (better) stuff but have agreed to help out for a while.

Maybe I'm naive. Or maybe I'm onto something. Or maybe I spent too long in the sun today.

 
At Sun Apr 23, 09:43:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's unsurprising TWW got trounced in the ratings by Extreme Makeover. This is a country where shows like Carnivale and The Wire have struggled to get the deserving audience. But I think some of TWW slump has been due to the rather drawn out process of Bartlet's final term (and the scriptwriting losing something after Sorkin and Schlamme left). I must admit listening to both candidates, I could not make a decision on who to chose. I agreed with Santos stance to provide education, healthcare for as many people as possible, but acknowledged Vinick's point about high taxes stifling the economies of some of the developing nations in Africa.

That said, I read ahead and know who won. I also found out who was 'scheduled' to win.

 
At Mon Apr 24, 12:16:00 AM , Anonymous dave said...

The reason I don't watch The West Wing, apart from commitment issues, is that political porn thing. The whole thing - however brilliant - is so far removed from the crushingly depressing reality that I simply can't watch it. (Which funnily enough exactly parallels my experiences with real porn. Apparently you're only supposed to experience ennui afterwards.)

You say "Vinick retorted." Can you imagine George Bush retorting to anything? Are you picturing him standing there with that idiot grin waiting for something, anything to come through the earpiece before the drool starts?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home